Radial: time to go distal
| dc.contributor.advisor | Misk, Rami A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aqel, Raed | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alzughayyar, Tareq Z | |
| dc.contributor.author | Misk, Rami A | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-24T08:16:55Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-22T08:53:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-11-24T08:16:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-05-22T08:53:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: trans-radial (snuffbox) approach is a newer approach for coronary catheterization with more advantages as compared with the classic anterior transradial approach. However, its routine use is still controversial due to the lack of data. Objective: This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness and safety of routine distal right radial (snuffbox) as a route for cardiac catheterization. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of 200 consecutive cardiac catheterization cases performed over 4 months. The distal right radial artery was accessed without ultrasound guidance in all cases, the default access was a distal left radial artery. Information regarding procedure details, success rates and cannulation times were tabulated. Records of patients follow up at 1 to 2-weeks interval postangiography were recorded. Results: Distal right radial artery access was successful without ultrasound guidance in 98%, the mean cannulation time was (1.35±0.55 min). No complications were recorded at one to two weeks follow up. Conclusion: Distal radial artery catheterization can be performed routinely with high success and safety profiles. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | 3 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8148 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.subject | Research Subject Categories::MEDICINE | en_US |
| dc.title | Radial: time to go distal | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
