Vertical and Hybrid Constructed Wetlands as a Sustainable Technique to Improve Domestic Wastewater Quality

dc.contributor.advisorAl-Tardeh, Sharaf
dc.contributor.advisorBol, Roland
dc.contributor.authorMlih, Rawan
dc.contributor.authorBol, Roland
dc.contributor.authorMasharqa, Asmaa
dc.contributor.authorAl-Tardeh, Sharaf
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T09:27:44Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T09:27:44Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-24
dc.descriptionReview Artiucleen_US
dc.description.abstractDeveloping safer and environmentally friendly methods for wastewater management is a crucial issue worldwide. Pollutants stemming from pure elemental, organic or inorganic compounds, or microbial sources, are an increasing problem in domestic wastewater. Constructed wetlands (CWs) have been used as an effective and low-cost method of treating different types of polluted water. This review paper focuses on the effectiveness of pollutant-removal from domestic wastewater using vertical flow constructed wetlands (VFCWs) and hybrid constructed wetlands (HCWs). Meta-analysis and ANOVA tests were conducted to analyse the potentiality of VFCW and HCW as a remedy for domestic wastewater and the effect of using different substrates and plant species. Meta-analysis shows a high significance (p = 0.001) between the interactions (method, plant, and substrate) on the pollutant’s removal efficiency. In both analysis methods, there were no significant differences between VFCW and HCW for the same pollutant (p > 0.05); the average removal percentages when using VFCW and HCW (according to ANOVA analysis) were 80% vs. 90% for BOD, 78% vs. 77% for COD, 75% vs. 83% for ammonium-N, 48% vs. 56% for TN, and 60% for TP, respectively. Moreover, this review article presents a comprehensive overview of the removal mechanisms for organics, inorganics, and metals from domestic wastewater using VFCW, and the effects of environmental parameters including substrate type, plant species, and dissolved oxygen which have direct and indirect impacts on physical, chemical, and biological removal mechanisms. In conclusion, VFCWs and HCWs seem to be an excellent approach, offering economical and environmentally friendly techniques for domestic wastewater treatment, but VFCW is considered simpler and more applicable for setting up on-site near houses, as there is no significant difference (p > 0.05) between applying VFCW or HCW on removal percentages for most pollutants, according to ANOVA testing. More work is needed to study the effect of non-planted VFCWs and HCWs on removal efficiency.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), supported Palestinian-German Science Bridge (PGSB), grant number 01DH16027. and the Palestinian-German Science Bridge (PGSB)en_US
dc.identifier.citationMasharqa, A.; Al-Tardeh, S.; Mlih, R.; Bol, R. Vertical and Hybrid ConstructedWetlands as a Sustainable Technique to Improve DomesticWastewater Quality. Water 2023, 15, 3348. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/w15193348en_US
dc.identifier.urischolar.ppu.edu/handle/123456789/8987
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLicensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerlanden_US
dc.subjectconstructed wetlands; wastewater; domestic wastewater; heavy metal; organic pollutants; inorganic pollutants; vertical flow constructed wetlands; hybrid constructed wetlandsen_US
dc.titleVertical and Hybrid Constructed Wetlands as a Sustainable Technique to Improve Domestic Wastewater Qualityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Asmaa water-15-03348.pdf
Size:
1.96 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
main article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: