DSpace Repository

Radial: time to go distal

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Misk, Rami A
dc.contributor.author Aqel, Raed
dc.contributor.author Alzughayyar, Tareq Z
dc.contributor.author Misk, Rami A
dc.date.accessioned 2020-11-24T08:16:55Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-22T08:53:07Z
dc.date.available 2020-11-24T08:16:55Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-22T08:53:07Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation 3 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8148
dc.description.abstract Background: trans-radial (snuffbox) approach is a newer approach for coronary catheterization with more advantages as compared with the classic anterior transradial approach. However, its routine use is still controversial due to the lack of data. Objective: This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness and safety of routine distal right radial (snuffbox) as a route for cardiac catheterization. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of 200 consecutive cardiac catheterization cases performed over 4 months. The distal right radial artery was accessed without ultrasound guidance in all cases, the default access was a distal left radial artery. Information regarding procedure details, success rates and cannulation times were tabulated. Records of patients follow up at 1 to 2-weeks interval postangiography were recorded. Results: Distal right radial artery access was successful without ultrasound guidance in 98%, the mean cannulation time was (1.35±0.55 min). No complications were recorded at one to two weeks follow up. Conclusion: Distal radial artery catheterization can be performed routinely with high success and safety profiles. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Research Subject Categories::MEDICINE en_US
dc.title Radial: time to go distal en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account